Evaluate with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: F(b) − F(a). 70 problems with worked solutions; in 70 of them every
equation is proved by a computer algebra system.
20 worked problems
Try each one before opening the solution. Every line is labeled with what checked it. How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x + e^(2x) from x = -1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -e^(-2)/2 + 3/2 + e^(4)/2. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x + e^(x) from x = -1 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -e^(-1) + 4 + e^(3). Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 3sin(x) + 2cos(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 3/2 + sqrt(3).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x + 3/x from x = 1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 3/2 + 3log(2).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = sqrt(x) - 1 from x = 1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -5/3 + 4sqrt(2)/3.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 2sqrt(x) - 2 from x = 1 to x = E. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -2E + 2/3 + 4e^(3/2)/3.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 2sqrt(x) - 1 from x = 1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -7/3 + 8sqrt(2)/3.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 3sqrt(x) + 1 from x = 1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -1 + 4sqrt(2).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 2sin(x) - 2cos(x) from x = 0 to x = pi/3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 1 - sqrt(3). Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x + 2/x from x = 1 to x = E. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 3/2 + e^(2)/2.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x + e^(x) from x = 2 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -e^(2) + 5/2 + e^(3).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 4sqrt(x) + 2 from x = 1 to x = E. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -14/3 + 2E + 8e^(3/2)/3.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 2 - 2x from x = 2 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -3. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 4x - 2 from x = 1 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 12.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x·(x² + 1)³ from x = -2 to x = 1. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -609/8. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 4x³ + 3x² - 2 from x = -2 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 90. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = -3x³ - 4x² - 3x + 1 from x = 0 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -429/4. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = x·(x² + 1)³ from x = 1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 609/8.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 2x² - 2x + 3 from x = 1 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 46/3.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The graph of f(x) = 3x² - 3x - 3 from x = 0 to x = 1. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, -7/2. Area below the x-axis counts as negative.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify