Definite integrals
Problem 4.127 · easy
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-2}^{2} 2 x^{3} + 2 x^{2} + 3 x + 4 \, dx \).
- By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, the integral is F(b) − F(a) for any antiderivative F.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{x^{4}}{2} + \frac{2 x^{3}}{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 4 x\right) = 2 x^{3} + 2 x^{2} + 3 x + 4 \]F(x) = x**4/2 + 2*x**3/3 + 3*x**2/2 + 4*x is an antiderivative: its derivative is the integrand.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \frac{x^{4}}{2} + \frac{2 x^{3}}{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 4 x \right|_{\substack{ x=-2 }} + \left. \frac{x^{4}}{2} + \frac{2 x^{3}}{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 4 x \right|_{\substack{ x=2 }} = \frac{80}{3} \]F(b) − F(a).✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{80}{3} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature (mpmath) gives the same value |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The antiderivative is correct, and the evaluation yields the correct result.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28 — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The antiderivative is correct, and the evaluation yields the correct result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28 — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, identifies the correct antiderivative, and computes the definite integral accurately.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/definite_integral, checked 2026-09-28 with SymPy 1.14.0.