Definite integrals
Problem 4.93 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-1}^{1} x \left(x^{2} + 1\right)^{3} \, dx \).
- By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, the integral is F(b) − F(a) for any antiderivative F.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{x^{8}}{8} + \frac{x^{6}}{2} + \frac{3 x^{4}}{4} + \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) = x \left(x^{2} + 1\right)^{3} \]F(x) = x**8/8 + x**6/2 + 3*x**4/4 + x**2/2 is an antiderivative: its derivative is the integrand.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \frac{x^{8}}{8} + \frac{x^{6}}{2} + \frac{3 x^{4}}{4} + \frac{x^{2}}{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=-1 }} + \left. \frac{x^{8}}{8} + \frac{x^{6}}{2} + \frac{3 x^{4}}{4} + \frac{x^{2}}{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 0 \]F(b) − F(a).✓ Proved
Answer \( 0 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature (mpmath) gives the same value |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The identified antiderivative is correct, and the evaluation at the bounds yields the correct result of 0.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-27 — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The identified antiderivative is correct, and the evaluation at the bounds yields the correct result of 0.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26 — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The antiderivative is verified, and the evaluation at the bounds is correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26 — The solution correctly identifies an antiderivative and applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to obtain the correct result. The algebraic steps are verified, and the logic is sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/definite_integral, checked 2026-09-27 with SymPy 1.14.0.