∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Definite integrals›Problem 4.241

Definite integrals

Problem 4.241 · easy

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{2}^{3} 1 - 3 x \, dx \).
  1. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, the integral is F(b) − F(a) for any antiderivative F.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + x\right) = 1 - 3 x \]
    F(x) = -3*x**2/2 + x is an antiderivative: its derivative is the integrand.✓ Proved
  3. \[ - \left. - \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + x \right|_{\substack{ x=2 }} + \left. - \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + x \right|_{\substack{ x=3 }} = - \frac{13}{2} \]
    F(b) − F(a).✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{13}{2} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0numerical quadrature (mpmath) gives the same value

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, identifies a valid antiderivative, and computes the definite integral accurately.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-03 — The solution correctly applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, identifies a valid antiderivative, and computes the definite integral accurately.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-03
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-03 — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative and applies the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to obtain the correct result.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-03

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/definite_integral, checked 2026-10-03 with SymPy 1.14.0.