∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle x - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \)

Problem 2.2006 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = x - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x - \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \]
    sumApply the difference rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    productApply the product rule to the second term.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \frac{2}{3} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    sumApply the sum rule to the first part of the product.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = - \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    constant simplifyThe derivative of the constant 2/3 is 0. Simplify the expression by removing the zero term.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \frac{\left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 2\right)}{3 x + 2} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the logarithm.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = - \frac{3 \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} x}{3 x + 2} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    sumApply the sum rule to the argument of the logarithm.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = - \frac{3 \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right)}{3 x + 2} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    constantThe derivative of x is 1.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = - \frac{3 \left(x + \frac{2}{3}\right)}{3 x + 2} - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + 1 \]
    derivativeEvaluate the remaining derivatives.✓ Proved
  10. \[ = - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \]
    algebra algebra simplify simplifyDistribute the negative sign. Distribute the 3 in the numerator. Simplify the fraction. Combine the constant terms.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
14✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 8 incorrectly labels the application of the constant‑multiple rule as a sum rule. The expression (1/(3*x+2))*3*Derivative(x,x) results from multiplying the constant 3 by the derivative of x, not from adding terms. This mislabeling could mislead a student about which rule applies.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-10 — Step 8 incorrectly labels the application of the constant‑multiple rule as a sum rule. The expression (1/(3*x+2))*3*Derivative(x,x) results from multiplying the constant 3 by the derivative of x, not from adding terms. This mislabeling could mislead a student about which rule applies.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-10
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-10 — Step 8 applies the sum rule to a constant‑multiple expression; it should be labeled "constant-multiple" (or "product"), not "sum". This mislabeling violates the rule‑granularity requirement.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-10 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. All labels are appropriate for the transformations performed.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-10 with SymPy 1.14.0.