∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 3›Cross product›Problem 9.99

Cross product

Problem 9.99 · medium

Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{v} \) for \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle -2, 3, 2 \rangle,\ \mathbf{v} = \langle 2, 1, -4 \rangle \), and the area of the parallelogram they span.
  1. Expand the determinant with rows i j k, u, v.
  2. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}-14\\-4\\-8\end{matrix}\right] \]
    The components.✓ Proved
  3. \[ 2 \sqrt{69} \]
    Area = |u × v|.✓ Proved
Answer \( \mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v} = \langle -14, -4, -8 \rangle,\quad \text{area} = 2 \sqrt{69} \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0Lagrange's identity √(|u|²|v|² − (u·v)²) gives the same area

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The cross product calculation is incorrect. The correct cross product is < -14, 4, -8 >, but the solution lists the y-component as -4. This error propagates to the area calculation, which should be sqrt(264) = 2*sqrt(66), not 2*sqrt(69).
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The cross product calculation is incorrect. The correct cross product is < -14, 4, -8 >, but the solution lists the y-component as -4. This error propagates to the area calculation, which should be sqrt(264) = 2*sqrt(66), not 2*sqrt(69).
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-26 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/cross_product_area, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.