Dot product and angles
Problem 9.166 · easy
Let \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle 4, 3, -4 \rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf{v} = \langle 2, 4, 5 \rangle \). Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{v} \) and the angle between them.
- \[ \left(-4\right) 5 + 4 \cdot 2 + 3 \cdot 4 = 0 \]Multiply componentwise and add.✓ Proved
- \[ \sqrt{41} \]|u|.
- \[ 3 \sqrt{5} \]|v|.
- \[ 0 \]cos θ = u·v / (|u||v|).
- θ = arccos of that.
Answer \( \mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v} = 0,\quad \theta = \frac{\pi}{2} \approx 90.00^\circ \)
Lines: 1 proved, 4 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Not checked | — | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| 3 | Not checked | — | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| 4 | Not checked | — | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| 5 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the law of cosines on the triangle u, v, u − v gives the same angle |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to explicitly state the calculated value of the angle (pi/2 or 90 degrees), which is a required part of the problem statement. Additionally, the sentence 'theta = arccos of that' is vague and does not constitute a complete derivation or final answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The solution fails to explicitly state the calculated value of the angle (pi/2 or 90 degrees), which is a required part of the problem statement. Additionally, the sentence 'theta = arccos of that' is vague and does not constitute a complete derivation or final answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The solution fails to explicitly state the final answer for the angle, which is required by the problem statement. While the intermediate steps are correct, the solution ends with a procedural instruction rather than the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The solution fails to state the final answer explicitly. While the intermediate steps correctly identify that cos(theta) = 0, the final sentence 'theta = arccos of that' is not a complete answer and does not explicitly state that theta = pi/2 as required by the problem.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/dot_product_angle, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.