Home›Calculus 3›Dot product and angles›Problem 9.165

Dot product and angles

Problem 9.165 · easy

Let \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle -1, 1, 2 \rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf{v} = \langle -3, 4, 1 \rangle \). Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{v} \) and the angle between them.

\[ 2 \cdot 1 - 1 \left(-3\right) + 1 \cdot 4 = 9 \]
Multiply componentwise and add.✓ Proved
\[ \sqrt{6} \]
|u|.✓ Proved
\[ \sqrt{26} \]
|v|.✓ Proved
\[ \frac{3 \sqrt{39}}{26} \]
cos θ = u·v / (|u||v|).✓ Proved
θ = arccos of that.

Answer \( \mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v} = 9,\quad \theta = \operatorname{acos}{\left(\frac{3 \sqrt{39}}{26} \right)} \approx 43.90^\circ \)

Lines: 4 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	the law of cosines on the triangle u, v, u − v gives the same angle

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The dot product calculation in step 1 is incorrect; it yields 9 instead of the correct value of 1. Consequently, the final angle is wrong.

Every verdict on record (4)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The dot product calculation in step 1 is incorrect; it yields 9 instead of the correct value of 1. Consequently, the final angle is wrong.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The dot product calculation in step 1 is incorrect; it computes 9 instead of the correct value 1. Consequently, the final angle is wrong.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/dot_product_angle, checked 2026-09-29 with SymPy 1.14.0.