Limits using Taylor series
Problem 7.606 · medium
Use Taylor series to evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\cos{\left(x \right)} - 1}{x^{2}} \).
- Near 0, cos(x) - 1 = x**4/24 - x**2/2 + ⋯ (its Maclaurin series).
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{- \frac{x^{4}}{24} + \frac{x^{2}}{2} + \cos{\left(x \right)} - 1}{x^{4}}\right) = 0 \]The polynomial matches the numerator to that order.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{\frac{x^{4}}{24} - \frac{x^{2}}{2}}{x^{2}} = \frac{x^{2}}{24} - \frac{1}{2} \]Divide through by the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{\cos{\left(x \right)} - 1}{x^{2}}\right) = - \frac{1}{2} \]Let x → 0: only the constant term survives.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{1}{2} \)
Lines: 3 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the expression at x = ±10⁻⁸ in 50-digit arithmetic |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "Step 1 contains a sign error in the Maclaurin series for cos(x) - 1. The correct expansion is -x^2/2 + x^4/24 - ..., but the solution writes x^4/24
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-17 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "Step 1 contains a sign error in the Maclaurin series for cos(x) - 1. The correct expansion is -x^2/2 + x^4/24 - ..., but the solution writes x^4/24gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-15 — Step 1 contains a sign error in the Maclaurin series expansion: it claims cos(x) - 1 = x**4/24 - x**2/2, but the correct expansion is -x**2/2 + x**4/24. While Step 3 uses the correct terms, Step 1 is mathematically false and would mislead a student about the series expansion.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The Maclaurin series for cos(x) - 1 is -x^2/2 + x^4/24 - ..., but line 1 states it as x^4/24 - x^2/2 + ..., which is technically correct in terms of terms but the order is confusing. More critically, line 2 computes a limit involving x^4 in the denominator to verify the series, but the problem asks for the limit with x^2 in the denominator. While the final answer is correct, the intermediate step in line 2 is irrelevant and potentially confusing, and line 3's division is correct but the explanation in line 4 is slightly imprecise (the limit of the polynomial is -1/2, not just 'the constant term survives' without mentioning the vanishing higher order terms). However, the most significant issue is that line 1 presents the series in a non-standard order (highest power first) which is unusual but not wrong. The real error is that the solution is overly complicated and the 'unchecked' equations are not standard steps for a simple Taylor series limit evaluation. But looking closer, line 1 says `cos(x) - 1 = x**4/24 - x**2/2 + ...`. This is correct. Line 3 divides by x^2 to get `x^2/24 - 1/2`. Line 4 takes the limit to get `-1/2`. The logic is sound. Why fail? Ah, line 2 is a distraction. Is it an error? No. Is it misleading? Maybe. Let's look at line 1 again. `cos(x) = 1 - x^2/2 + x^4/24 - ...`. So `cos(x) - 1 = -x^2/2 + x^4/24 - ...`. Line 1 writes `x**4/24 - x**2/2`. This is correct. The solution is actually correct. Wait, the prompt says 'find what is wrong'. Let me re-read carefully. Line 1: `cos(x) - 1 = x**4/24 - x**2/2 + ...`. This is correct. Line 3: `(x**4/24 - x**2/2)/x**2 = x**2/24 - 1/2`. Correct. Line 4: Limit is -1/2. Correct. Is there a subtle error? The problem asks to use Taylor series. The solution does. The answer is correct. Maybe the 'error' is in the presentation of the series in line 1? It lists the x^4 term before the x^2 term. This is non-standard but not wrong. However, in line 2, it checks the limit against x^4. This is unnecessary. But is it an error? No. Let's look at the 'unchecked' tag. The prompt says 'each line ... is either an EQUATION ... or a SENTENCE'. Line 2 is an equation. It is marked 'unchecked'. The prompt says 'do not re-check the algebra of a line marked proved'. It doesn't say 'unchecked' lines are proven. It says 'computer algebra system has already checked (its result is shown; do not re-check the algebra of a line marked proved)'. This implies 'unchecked' lines might not be checked? Or maybe 'unchecked' means the CAS didn't check it? If the CAS didn't check it, I should check it. Line 2: Limit((-x**4/24 + x**2/2 + cos(x) - 1)/x**4, x, 0). The numerator is `cos(x) - 1 - (-x^2/2 + x^4/24)`. Since `cos(x) - 1 = -x^2/2 + x^4/24 - x^6/720 + ...`, the numerator is `-x^6/720 + ...`. Divided by x^4, it is `-x^2/720 + ...`. Limit as x->0 is 0. So the equation is correct. Line 3 is correct. Line 4 is correct. Why would this fail? Perhaps the issue is that line 1 is a sentence, not an equation? No, it's marked [sentence]. It states the series. It is correct. Is it misleading? Listing higher order terms first is unusual. But not wrong. Let's look at the severity. If it's correct, I should say pass. But the instructions say 'find what is wrong'. Is there a sign error? `cos(x) - 1`. Series: `1 - x^2/2 + x^4/24 - 1 = -x^2/2 + x^4/24`. Line 1: `x**4/24 - x**2/2`. Correct. Line 3: Divide by x^2. `x^2/24 - 1/2`. Correct. Limit: -1/2. Correct. Okay, I will look for a 'style' or 'misleading' issue. The order of terms in line 1 is descending powers? No, ascending is standard. `x^4` then `x^2` is descending. This is non-standard for Maclaurin series which are usually written in ascending powers of x. This could be considered 'misleading' or 'style'. Given the adversarial nature, I will flag the non-standard ordering of the series expansion in line 1 as misleading/unconventional, although mathematically equivalent. Actually, looking at line 2, it uses `-x**4/24 + x**2/2`. This is the negative of the expression in line 1. Line 1 says `cos(x)-1 = A`. Line 2 checks `Limit((-A + cos(x)-1)/x^4)`. This is consistent. I think the solution is technically correct but the presentation of the series in line 1 (highest power first) is poor style. I will mark it as style.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/taylor_limit, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.