Limits using Taylor series
Problem 7.605 · medium
Use Taylor series to evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x\to 0} \frac{2 x - 2 e^{x} + 2}{x^{2}} \).
- Near 0, -x + exp(x) - 1 = x**3/6 + x**2/2 + ⋯ (its Maclaurin series).
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{- \frac{x^{3}}{6} - \frac{x^{2}}{2} - x + e^{x} - 1}{x^{3}}\right) = 0 \]The polynomial matches the numerator to that order.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{- \frac{x^{3}}{3} - x^{2}}{x^{2}} = - \frac{x}{3} - 1 \]Divide through by the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{2 x - 2 e^{x} + 2}{x^{2}}\right) = -1 \]Let x → 0: only the constant term survives.✓ Proved
Answer \( -1 \)
Lines: 3 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the expression at x = ±10⁻⁸ in 50-digit arithmetic |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution contains a sign error in the setup. The numerator is $2x - 2e^x + 2 = -2(e^x - x - 1)$. Since $e^x - x - 1 = x^2/2 + x^3/6 + \\dots$, t
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-17 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution contains a sign error in the setup. The numerator is $2x - 2e^x + 2 = -2(e^x - x - 1)$. Since $e^x - x - 1 = x^2/2 + x^3/6 + \\dots$, tgpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-15 — The solution incorrectly analyzes the limit of a different expression in step 2 (dividing by x^3 instead of x^2), and the logic in step 4 is flawed because it claims the limit is -1 based on the constant term of the expansion from step 3, ignoring that step 2 was irrelevant and the connection between the numerator's expansion and the final result is not properly justified in the text.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The solution incorrectly substitutes the expansion for `-x + exp(x) - 1` into the numerator `2x - 2exp(x) + 2`. The numerator is equal to `-2(-x + exp(x) - 1)`, so the substitution should yield `-2(x^2/2 + x^3/6 + ...)`, not `+2(x^2/2 + x^3/6 + ...)`. This sign error leads to the incorrect final answer of -1 instead of the correct answer 1.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/taylor_limit, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.