Home›Calculus 2›Separable differential equations›Problem 6.95

Separable differential equations

Problem 6.95 · medium Video

Solve the initial-value problem \( \displaystyle \dfrac{dy}{dx} = - 3 y,\ y(0) = 3 \).

Separate the variables, putting every y on one side and every x on the other, and integrate both sides.
Use y(0) to find the constant of integration, then solve for y.
\[ \frac{d}{d x} 3 e^{- 3 x} = - 9 e^{- 3 x} \]
The solution satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
\[ 3 \]
And the initial condition.

Answer \( y = 3 e^{- 3 x} \)

The slope field of y' = -3y: short segments showing the slope at each point. Several solution curves follow the field; the one through (0, 3) is highlighted, y = 3e^(-3x).

Lines: 1 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
2	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4	Not checked	—	both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	sympy.checkodesol substitutes the solution into the equation; y(0) matches

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution claims to separate variables and integrate, but fails to show the integration step or the determination of the constant C. It jumps directly to the final answer without demonstrating the method described in the sentences.

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — The solution claims to separate variables and integrate, but fails to show the integration step or the determination of the constant C. It jumps directly to the final answer without demonstrating the method described in the sentences.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-26 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims the derivative of 3*exp(-3*x) is -9*exp(-3*x), which is incorrect; the derivative is -9*exp(-3*x) only if the function were 3*ex
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-26 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims the derivative of 3*exp(-3*x) is -9*exp(-3*x), which is incorrect; the derivative is -9*exp(-3*x) only if the function were 3*ex
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/separable_ode, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.