Separable differential equations
Problem 6.93 · medium
Solve the initial-value problem \( \displaystyle \dfrac{dy}{dx} = \frac{2 x}{y},\ y(0) = 4 \).
- Separate the variables, putting every y on one side and every x on the other, and integrate both sides.
- Use y(0) to find the constant of integration, then solve for y.
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{2 x^{2} + 16} = \frac{2 x}{\sqrt{2 x^{2} + 16}} \]The solution satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
- \[ 4 \]And the initial condition.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = \sqrt{2 x^{2} + 16} \)
Lines: 2 proved, 2 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | sympy.checkodesol substitutes the solution into the equation; y(0) matches |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution skips the actual derivation steps (separation of variables, integration, and solving for the constant) and instead only verifies the final answer. This fails to demonstrate the method required to solve the initial-value problem.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution skips the actual derivation steps (separation of variables, integration, and solving for the constant) and instead only verifies the final answer. This fails to demonstrate the method required to solve the initial-value problem.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution fails to address the sign ambiguity inherent in solving for y (y = ±sqrt(...)). While the positive root is correct for this specific initial condition, the method described ('solve for y') is incomplete without explicitly justifying the choice of sign based on y(0)=4 > 0.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/separable_ode, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.