∫Calc Practice

Integrals giving inverse trig functions

Problem 4.507 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int \frac{1}{\sqrt{- x^{2} - 2 x + 3}}\, dx \).
  1. \[ - x^{2} - 2 x + 3 = 4 - \left(x + 1\right)^{2} \]
    Complete the square.✓ Proved
  2. With u = x + 1 and a = 2, this is c·∫ du/√(a² − u²)
  3. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{asin}{\left(\frac{x}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{- x^{2} - 2 x + 3}} \]
    An antiderivative is asin(x/2 + 1/2); differentiate to confirm.✓ Proved
Answer \( \operatorname{asin}{\left(\frac{x}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)} + C \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0difference quotient of the answer at x = -2.9

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The sentence claims the integral becomes "c·∫ du/√(a²−u²)" with an undefined constant c. In fact, after the substitution u=x+1, the integral is exactly ∫du/√(4−u²) with no extra factor. This misstates the standard form and could mislead a student about the role of constants in the substitution.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-06 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The sentence claims the integral becomes "c·∫ du/√(a²−u²)" with an undefined constant c. In fact, after the substitution u=x+1, the integral is exactly ∫du/√(4−u²) with no extra factor. This misstates the standard form and could mislead a student about the role of constants in the substitution.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly completes the square, identifies the standard arcsine integral form, and verifies the result by differentiation.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/inverse_trig_integral, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.