Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1271 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-4}^{0} \left|{x + 2}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = -2.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{2^{2}}{2} + \frac{2^{2}}{2} = 4 \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{-4}^{0} \left|{x + 2}\right|\, dx = 4 \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( 4 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas accurately. The reasoning is sound and the final answer is correct.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas accurately. The reasoning is sound and the final answer is correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas accurately. The reasoning is sound and leads to the correct result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas accurately. The reasoning is sound and leads to the correct result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.