Home›Calculus 1›Definite integrals from area formulas›Problem 4.1270

Definite integrals from area formulas

Problem 4.1270 · easy Video

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-4}^{3} \left|{x}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.

The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = 0.
\[ \frac{3^{2}}{2} + \frac{4^{2}}{2} = \frac{25}{2} \]
Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
\[ \int\limits_{-4}^{3} \left|{x}\right|\, dx = \frac{25}{2} \]
Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved

Answer \( \frac{25}{2} \)

The graph of f(x) = Abs(x) from x = -4 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 25/2.

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
2	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	numerical quadrature

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer returned a non-object

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-19 — reviewer returned a non-object
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-17 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "misleading", "notes": "The solution claims the area is 25/2, but the correct area is 25/2 + 9/2 = 34/2 = 17. The calculation 3**2/2 + 4**2/2 equals 9/2 + 16/2 = 25/2,
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shapes (two triangles) and calculates their areas to find the integral of the absolute value function. The logic is sound and the result is correct.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.