Home›Calculus 1›Definite integrals from area formulas›Problem 4.1186

Definite integrals from area formulas

Problem 4.1186 · easy Video

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{0}^{2} x + 4 \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.

The region between the graph and the x-axis is a trapezoid.
Reviewed
\[ \frac{\left(0 + 2\right) \left(4 + 6\right)}{2} = 10 \]
Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
\[ \int\limits_{0}^{2} \left(x + 4\right)\, dx = 10 \]
Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved

Answer \( 10 \)

The graph of f(x) = x + 4 from x = 0 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 10.

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	Reviewed	reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx	a sentence; read, not computed
2	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	numerical quadrature

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The logic is sound and the result matches the direct integration.

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The logic is sound and the result matches the direct integration.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The logic is sound and the result is correct.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula with the correct dimensions (height 2, parallel sides 4 and 6) to obtain the correct result.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.