Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1185 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{1}^{5} - 2 x \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is a trapezoid, below the axis.
- \[ \frac{\left(-10 - 2\right) \left(-1 + 5\right)}{2} = -24 \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{1}^{5} \left(- 2 x\right)\, dx = -24 \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( -24 \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer returned a non-object
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-18 — reviewer returned a non-objectgpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula with the correct sign for the region below the x-axis.gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-16 — The description of the region as a trapezoid is incorrect; the shape bounded by the line, the x‑axis, and the vertical lines x=1 and x=5 is a general quadrilateral, not a trapezoid. The area formula used assumes parallel bases, which does not hold here.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution incorrectly identifies the region as a single trapezoid. The function f(x) = -2x is linear, so the region between the graph and the x-agpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.