Derivatives and integrals of hyperbolic functions
Problem 2.2510 · medium
Find \( \displaystyle \int \cosh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
- Use (cosh u)′ = sinh u, (sinh u)′ = cosh u, (tanh u)′ = sech²u, with a substitution for the inside.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sinh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)}}{3} = \cosh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \]Differentiating the answer returns the integrand.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\sinh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)}}{3} + C \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | a central difference, with sinh and cosh computed from exponentials by mpmath |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the integration rule for cosh and applies the chain rule adjustment. The verification step confirms the result.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-28 — The solution correctly identifies the integration rule for cosh and applies the chain rule adjustment. The verification step confirms the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-28qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-27 — The solution correctly identifies the integration rule for cosh and applies the chain rule via substitution. The verification step confirms the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-27qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-27 — The solution correctly identifies the integration rule for cosh and applies the chain rule factor of 1/3. The verification step confirms the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-27
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/hyperbolic_calculus, checked 2026-10-28 with SymPy 1.14.0.