Derivatives and integrals of hyperbolic functions
Problem 2.2447 · easy
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \sinh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \).
- (sinh u)′ = cosh u·u′, (cosh u)′ = sinh u·u′, (tanh u)′ = sech²u·u′, (sinh⁻¹u)′ = u′/√(1 + u²), (tanh⁻¹u)′ = u′/(1 − u²).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \sinh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)}\right) = - 3 \cosh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \]Apply the rule (and the chain rule).✓ Proved
Answer \( f'(x) = - 3 \cosh{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | a central difference, with sinh and cosh computed from exponentials by mpmath |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of the hyperbolic sine function. The setup and conclusion are mathematically sound.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of the hyperbolic sine function. The setup and conclusion are mathematically sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of the hyperbolic sine function. The stated answer is correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and the derivative of the hyperbolic sine function. The setup and conclusion are sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/hyperbolic_calculus, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.