∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Product rule›Problem 2.2414

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{3 x^{2}}{4} - x + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \)

Problem 2.2414 · hard Video

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{3 x^{2}}{4} - x + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4} - x + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)}\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the entire function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \]
    sumApply the sum rule to separate the terms.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) - \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) \]
    productApply the product rule to the third term.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \left(\frac{d}{d x} \frac{2}{3} + \frac{d}{d x} 2 x + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 x^{2}}{2}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) \]
    sumApply the sum rule to the first part of the product.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \left(\frac{d}{d x} 2 x + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 x^{2}}{2}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) \]
    constant algebraThe derivative of the constant 2/3 is zero. Simplify the expression by removing the zero term.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \left(\frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) - 1 \]
    constantEvaluate the derivatives of the simple terms.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) - 1 \]
    powerApply the power rule to the term 3*x**2/2.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) - 1 + \frac{\left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 2\right)}{3 x + 2} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the log term.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 x^{2}}{4}\right) - 1 + \frac{3 \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right)}{3 x + 2} \]
    derivativeEvaluate the derivative of the inner function 3*x + 2.✓ Proved
  10. \[ = - \frac{3 x}{2} + \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - 1 + \frac{3 \left(\frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 2 x + \frac{2}{3}\right)}{3 x + 2} \]
    powerEvaluate the derivative of -3*x**2/4.✓ Proved
  11. \[ = - \frac{3 x}{2} + \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} - 1 + \frac{\frac{9 x^{2}}{2} + 6 x + 2}{3 x + 2} \]
    algebra simplify simplifyDistribute the 3 into the polynomial term. The expression is already in its simplest form. Final simplified result.✓ Proved
Answer \( \left(3 x + 2\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 2 \right)} \)
Top: the graph of f = -3x²/4 - x + (3x²/2 + 2x + 2/3)·log(3x + 2). A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f' = -3x/2 + (3x + 2)·log(3x + 2) - 1 + 3(3x²/2 + 2x + 2/3)/(3x + 2).

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
14✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 2 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 13 incorrectly adds and subtracts extra terms, resulting in an algebraic error. The expression should not contain the extra "-1 + 1" pair.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Step 7 applies the 'constant' rule to evaluate Derivative(x, x) and Derivative(2*x, x), but the derivative of x is a basic power rule application, and the derivative of 2x involves the constant-multiple rule; labeling these as 'constant' is incorrect. Additionally, Step 13 and 14 are redundant no-ops that add no value.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-19 — Step 7 applies the 'constant' rule to evaluate Derivative(x, x) and Derivative(2*x, x), but the derivative of x is a basic power rule application, and the derivative of 2x involves the constant-multiple rule; labeling these as 'constant' is incorrect. Additionally, Step 13 and 14 are redundant no-ops that add no value.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-19 — Step 13 incorrectly adds and subtracts extra terms, resulting in an algebraic error. The expression should not contain the extra "-1 + 1" pair.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-16 — Step 7 applies the derivative rule to multiple terms simultaneously (Derivative(x, x) and Derivative(2*x, x)), violating the one-change-per-step constraint. Steps 13 and 14 are redundant and do not perform any actual simplification.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-16 — Step 13 applies two changes (adding -1 and +1) in one step and is labeled "simplify". Each step must change only one thing; this violates the granularity rule.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-16 — Step 7 applies the 'constant' rule but performs multiple distinct operations: it evaluates Derivative(x, x) to 1, Derivative(2*x, x) to 2, and removes the zero term from the previous step. This violates the one-rule-per-step constraint. Additionally, Step 13 adds and subtracts 1 with no mathematical purpose, which is misleading and violates the single-change rule.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-16 — Step 13 adds an unnecessary "-1 + 1" pair, applying two operations (adding terms and simplifying) in one step, which violates the single‑rule‑per‑step rule and introduces an incorrect intermediate expression.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.