Derivatives and integrals of hyperbolic functions
Problem 2.2356 · easy
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \cosh{\left(2 x \right)} \).
- (sinh u)′ = cosh u·u′, (cosh u)′ = sinh u·u′, (tanh u)′ = sech²u·u′, (sinh⁻¹u)′ = u′/√(1 + u²), (tanh⁻¹u)′ = u′/(1 − u²).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \cosh{\left(2 x \right)} = 2 \sinh{\left(2 x \right)} \]Apply the rule (and the chain rule).✓ Proved
Answer \( f'(x) = 2 \sinh{\left(2 x \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | a central difference, with sinh and cosh computed from exponentials by mpmath |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of cosh. The stated formulas in the first line are correct, and the final result matches the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of cosh. The stated formulas in the first line are correct, and the final result matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies and applies the chain rule for the derivative of the hyperbolic cosine function. The stated differentiation rules are accurate.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and the standard derivative formula for hyperbolic cosine. The setup and conclusion are sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/hyperbolic_calculus, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.