∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.1175

Derivative of \( \displaystyle 5 \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \)

Problem 2.1175 · medium Mental math

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 5 \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} 5 \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = 5 \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \]
    constant-multiplePull the constant out of the derivative.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{5}{\sqrt{1 - x^{2}}} \]
    inverse-trigApply the derivative rule for arcsine.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{5}{\sqrt{1 - x^{2}}} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
asin is real only on [-1, 1]
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
asin is real only on [-1, 1]
undefined where 1 - x**2 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 1 - x**2 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 1 is labeled "unlabelled" even though it applies the derivative rule. The correct label should be "derivative".
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-29 — Step 1 is labeled "unlabelled" even though it applies the derivative rule. The correct label should be "derivative".
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-29 — Step 1 is unlabeled and applies the derivative rule to the product 5*asin(x). It should be labeled (e.g., "derivative" or "constant-multiple") to meet the labeling requirement.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-29 with SymPy 1.14.0.