∫Calc Practice

Triple integrals over general regions

Problem 11.284 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \iiint_E z\, dV \), where \( \displaystyle E = \{(x, y, z) : 0 \le x \le 3,\ 0 \le y \le 3 - x,\ 0 \le z \le - x - y + 3\} \).
  1. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{- x - y + 3} z\, dz = \frac{x^{2}}{2} + x y - 3 x + \frac{y^{2}}{2} - 3 y + \frac{9}{2} \]
    Integrate in z first.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{3 - x} \frac{\left(- x - y + 3\right)^{2}}{2}\, dy = - \frac{x^{3}}{6} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} - \frac{9 x}{2} + \frac{9}{2} \]
    Then in y.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{3} \left(\frac{\left(3 - x\right)^{3}}{6} + \left(3 - x\right)^{2} \left(\frac{x}{2} - \frac{3}{2}\right) + \left(3 - x\right) \left(\frac{x^{2}}{2} - 3 x + \frac{9}{2}\right)\right)\, dx = \frac{27}{8} \]
    Then in x.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{27}{8} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0nested numerical quadrature

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly sets up the iterated integral based on the region E and performs the integration steps accurately. The final result matches the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly sets up the iterated integral based on the region E and performs the integration steps accurately. The final result matches the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly sets up the iterated integral with the appropriate bounds and order of integration. The algebraic steps, although presented in a somewhat expanded form in the final step, are correct and lead to the right answer.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/triple_integral_region, checked 2026-10-07 with SymPy 1.14.0.