∫Calc Practice

Estimating a limit from a table

Problem 1.728 · easy

Make a table of values of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\tan{\left(5 x \right)}}{x} \) at \( \displaystyle x = 0 \pm 0.1,\ 0 \pm 0.01,\ 0 \pm 0.001,\ 0 \pm 0.0001 \) and use it to estimate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) \).
  1. f(0) itself is undefined (0/0), so the table approaches 0 from both sides.
  2. The table: f(0 − 0.1) ≈ 5.4630249; f(0 − 0.01) ≈ 5.00417084; f(0 − 0.001) ≈ 5.00004167; f(0 − 0.0001) ≈ 5.00000042; f(0 + 0.0001) ≈ 5.00000042; f(0 + 0.001) ≈ 5.00004167; f(0 + 0.01) ≈ 5.00417084; f(0 + 0.1) ≈ 5.4630249.
  3. From both sides the values settle toward 5.000000.
  4. \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{\tan{\left(5 x \right)}}{x}\right) = 5 \]
    The exact (two-sided) limit agrees with the table.✓ Proved
Answer \( \lim_{x\to 0} f(x) = 5 \approx 5.000000 \)

Lines: 1 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f evaluated at a ± 10⁻⁹ in 30-digit arithmetic

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the function approaches 0 from both sides; the correct behavior is that f(x) tends to 5 as x→0.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical approximations for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 5.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical approximations for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 5.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-19 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the function approaches 0 from both sides; the correct behavior is that f(x) tends to 5 as x→0.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical approximations for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 5.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-18 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the function approaches 0 from both sides; it actually approaches 5. The table values are correct, but the description of the behavior at 0 is false.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical values for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 5.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-18 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the values approach 0 from both sides; they actually approach 5. The statement misleads the reader about the behavior of the function near 0.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/limit_table, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.