∫Calc Practice

Estimating a limit from a table

Problem 1.604 · easy

Make a table of values of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sin{\left(5 x \right)}}{\sin{\left(x \right)}} \) at \( \displaystyle x = 0 \pm 0.1,\ 0 \pm 0.01,\ 0 \pm 0.001,\ 0 \pm 0.0001 \) and use it to estimate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) \).
  1. f(0) itself is undefined (0/0), so the table approaches 0 from both sides.
  2. The table: f(0 − 0.1) ≈ 4.80225514; f(0 − 0.01) ≈ 4.99800023; f(0 − 0.001) ≈ 4.99998; f(0 − 0.0001) ≈ 4.9999998; f(0 + 0.0001) ≈ 4.9999998; f(0 + 0.001) ≈ 4.99998; f(0 + 0.01) ≈ 4.99800023; f(0 + 0.1) ≈ 4.80225514.
  3. From both sides the values settle toward 5.000000.
  4. \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{\sin{\left(5 x \right)}}{\sin{\left(x \right)}}\right) = 5 \]
    The exact (two-sided) limit agrees with the table.✓ Proved
Answer \( \lim_{x\to 0} f(x) = 5 \approx 5.000000 \)

Lines: 1 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f evaluated at a ± 10⁻⁹ in 30-digit arithmetic

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the table approaches 0 from both sides; the values actually approach 5, not 0.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical evidence from both sides, and confirms the limit analytically.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical evidence from both sides, and confirms the limit analytically.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-17 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the table approaches 0 from both sides; the values actually approach 5, not 0.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical values for the specified points, and draws the correct conclusion consistent with the analytical limit.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the function values approach 0 from both sides; they actually approach 5. The claim that the table approaches 0 is false and misleading.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical approximations consistent with the limit, and draws the correct conclusion.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the values approach 0; they actually approach 5. The statement about approaching 0 is false and misleads the reader.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/limit_table, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.