∫Calc Practice

Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{2 x}{\sin{\left(2 x \right)}} \) as \( x \to 0 \)

Problem 1.6 · easy Video

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2 x}{\sin{\left(2 x \right)}} \).
  1. \[ \lim_{x \to 0^+}\left(\frac{2 x}{\sin{\left(2 x \right)}}\right) \]
    limitStart with the original limit expression.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \lim_{x \to 0^+}\left(\frac{x}{\sin{\left(x \right)}}\right) \]
    simplifySimplify the fraction by dividing numerator and denominator by 2.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \lim_{x \to 0^+}\left(\frac{\frac{d}{d x} x}{\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(x \right)}}\right) \]
    lhopitalApply L'Hôpital's Rule because the limit is in the indeterminate form 0/0.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{1}{\cos{\left(x \right)}} \]
    simplifyCompute the derivatives of the numerator and denominator.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = 1 \]
    limit simplifyEvaluate the limit by substituting x = 0. Calculate the final value.✓ Proved
Answer \( 1 \)
The graph of f(x) = 2x/sin(2x). Two points slide along the curve toward x = 0, one from each side; their heights close in on 1.

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. A reviewer's objection to the explanation stands; see the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where sin(2*x) = 0
undefined where sin(x) = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where sin(x) = 0
undefined where Derivative(sin(x), x) = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where Derivative(sin(x), x) = 0
undefined where cos(x) = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(x) = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 2 incorrectly simplifies 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x). The correct simplification uses sin(2x)=2 sin(x) cos(x), yielding x/(sin(x) cos(x)), not x/sin(x).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 2 claims to simplify 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x) by dividing numerator and denominator by 2, which is algebraically incorrect (sin(2*x)/2 is not sin(x)). This is a mathematical error, not just a labeling issue.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-03 — Step 2 claims to simplify 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x) by dividing numerator and denominator by 2, which is algebraically incorrect (sin(2*x)/2 is not sin(x)). This is a mathematical error, not just a labeling issue.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-03 — Step 2 incorrectly simplifies 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x). The correct simplification uses sin(2x)=2 sin(x) cos(x), yielding x/(sin(x) cos(x)), not x/sin(x).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — Step 2 claims to simplify 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x) by dividing numerator and denominator by 2, which is algebraically incorrect (the denominator would become sin(2*x)/2, not sin(x)). This is a mathematical error, not just a labeling issue.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — Step 2 incorrectly simplifies 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x). The correct simplification uses sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x), yielding x/(sin(x)cos(x)), not x/sin(x).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — Step 2 incorrectly transforms the limit expression. Dividing the numerator and denominator by 2 yields x/sin(2x), not x/sin(x). The solver effectively changed the argument of the sine function without justification, which is mathematically invalid.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — Step 2 incorrectly simplifies 2*x/sin(2*x) to x/sin(x). The correct simplification would involve sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x), yielding x/(sin(x)cos(x)), not x/sin(x).

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-03 with SymPy 1.14.0.