Estimating a limit from a table
Problem 1.598 · easy
Make a table of values of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{e^{2 x} - 1}{x} \) at \( \displaystyle x = 0 \pm 0.1,\ 0 \pm 0.01,\ 0 \pm 0.001,\ 0 \pm 0.0001 \) and use it to estimate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) \).
- f(0) itself is undefined (0/0), so the table approaches 0 from both sides.
- The table: f(0 − 0.1) ≈ 1.81269247; f(0 − 0.01) ≈ 1.98013267; f(0 − 0.001) ≈ 1.99800133; f(0 − 0.0001) ≈ 1.99980001; f(0 + 0.0001) ≈ 2.00020001; f(0 + 0.001) ≈ 2.00200133; f(0 + 0.01) ≈ 2.020134; f(0 + 0.1) ≈ 2.21402758.
- From both sides the values settle toward 2.000000.
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0}\left(\frac{e^{2 x} - 1}{x}\right) = 2 \]The exact (two-sided) limit agrees with the table.✓ Proved
Answer \( \lim_{x\to 0} f(x) = 2 \approx 2.000000 \)
Lines: 1 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | f evaluated at a ± 10⁻⁹ in 30-digit arithmetic |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the values approach 0; they actually approach 2. The rest of the solution is correct.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical values for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 2 based on the trend.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical values for the specified points, and correctly concludes the limit is 2 based on the trend.gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-17 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the values approach 0; they actually approach 2. The rest of the solution is correct.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical values for the specified points, and correctly infers the limit from the table.gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-14 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the values approach 0 from both sides; they actually approach 2. The rest of the solution is correct.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the indeterminate form, provides accurate numerical approximations for the specified points, and correctly infers the limit from the trend.gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-14 — Sentence 1 incorrectly states that the table approaches 0 from both sides; it should say the values approach 2.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/limit_table, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.