∫Calc Practice

Projections and orthogonality

Problem 9.587 · hard

Write \( \displaystyle \mathbf u = \left\langle -1, 3 \right\rangle \) as the sum of a vector parallel to \( \displaystyle \mathbf v = \left\langle 1, -6 \right\rangle \) and a vector orthogonal to it.
  1. \[ -18 - 1 = -19 \]
    u·v.✓ Proved
  2. \[ 1 + 36 = 37 \]
    ‖v‖².✓ Proved
  3. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}- \frac{19}{37}\\\frac{114}{37}\end{matrix}\right] \]
    proj = (u·v/‖v‖²) v.✓ Proved
  4. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}- \frac{18}{37}\\- \frac{3}{37}\end{matrix}\right] \]
    The orthogonal part is u − proj.✓ Proved
  5. \[ 0 \]
    It is orthogonal to v.✓ Proved
Answer \( \left\langle - \frac{19}{37}, \frac{114}{37} \right\rangle + \left\langle - \frac{18}{37}, - \frac{3}{37} \right\rangle \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the remainder is orthogonal to v and the projection is parallel to it

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the vector projection formula and verifies orthogonality. The steps are logically sound and the arithmetic is correct.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13 — The solution correctly applies the vector projection formula and verifies orthogonality. The steps are logically sound and the arithmetic is correct.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/vector_projection, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.