∫Calc Practice

Triple products and volumes

Problem 9.402 · medium

Find a unit vector orthogonal to both \( \displaystyle \mathbf u = \left\langle -4, 1, 0 \right\rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf v = \left\langle -2, 1, 0 \right\rangle \).
  1. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}0\\0\\-2\end{matrix}\right] \]
    u × v is orthogonal to both.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}0\\0\\-1\end{matrix}\right] \]
    Divide by its length.✓ Proved
Answer \( \left\langle 0, 0, -1 \right\rangle\ (\text{or its negative}) \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0length 1 and zero dot product with u and v

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly computes the cross product to find an orthogonal vector and normalizes it to obtain a unit vector. The steps are logically sound and the final answer is correct.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-08
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-08 — The solution correctly computes the cross product to find an orthogonal vector and normalizes it to obtain a unit vector. The steps are logically sound and the final answer is correct.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-08 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The cross product calculation is incorrect; the z-component should be (-4)(1) - (1)(-2) = -2, but the solution claims the result is <0, 0, -2> witho
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-08

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/triple_product, checked 2026-10-08 with SymPy 1.14.0.