Lines in space
Problem 9.310 · easy
Are the lines \( \displaystyle \mathbf r_1(t) = \left\langle 4 - 2 t, 3 - t, - t - 2 \right\rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf r_2(s) = \left\langle 4 - 4 s, 4 - 2 s, - 2 s - 5 \right\rangle \) parallel, intersecting, or skew? If they intersect, find the point.
- \[ \left[\begin{matrix}0\\0\\0\end{matrix}\right] \]d₁ × d₂: zero exactly when the directions are parallel.✓ Proved
- The directions are parallel and P₂ is not on L₁, so the lines are parallel and distinct.Reviewed
Answer \( \text{parallel} \)
Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the closest approach of the two lines, found numerically |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies that the direction vectors are scalar multiples (parallel) and implicitly verifies that the lines are distinct (not coincident) by checking a point, leading to the correct classification of parallel lines.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly identifies that the direction vectors are scalar multiples (parallel) and implicitly verifies that the lines are distinct (not coincident) by checking a point, leading to the correct classification of parallel lines.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims the lines are parallel, but the direction vectors < -2, -1, -1 > and < -4, -2, -2 > are scalar multiples, so they are indeed pargpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/lines_in_space, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.