∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 3›Lines in space›Problem 9.307

Lines in space

Problem 9.307 · easy

Are the lines \( \displaystyle \mathbf r_1(t) = \left\langle t - 4, 0, - 2 t - 3 \right\rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf r_2(s) = \left\langle - 2 s - 1, 2, 4 s - 3 \right\rangle \) parallel, intersecting, or skew? If they intersect, find the point.
  1. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}0\\0\\0\end{matrix}\right] \]
    d₁ × d₂: zero exactly when the directions are parallel.✓ Proved
  2. The directions are parallel and P₂ is not on L₁, so the lines are parallel and distinct.
Answer \( \text{parallel} \)

Lines: 1 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the closest approach of the two lines, found numerically

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims the lines are parallel based on the cross product of direction vectors being zero, but the direction vectors <1, 0, -2> and <-2,
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims the lines are parallel based on the cross product of direction vectors being zero, but the direction vectors <1, 0, -2> and <-2,
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/lines_in_space, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.