∫Calc Practice

Dot product and angles

Problem 9.191 · easy

Let \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle -3, 1, 0 \rangle \) and \( \displaystyle \mathbf{v} = \langle 4, -5, -1 \rangle \). Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{v} \) and the angle between them.
  1. \[ \left(-3\right) 4 + 1 \left(-5\right) + 0 \left(-1\right) = -17 \]
    Multiply componentwise and add.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \sqrt{10} \]
    |u|.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \sqrt{42} \]
    |v|.✓ Proved
  4. \[ - \frac{17 \sqrt{105}}{210} \]
    cos θ = u·v / (|u||v|).✓ Proved
  5. θ = arccos of that.
    Reviewed
Answer \( \mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v} = -17,\quad \theta = \operatorname{acos}{\left(- \frac{17 \sqrt{105}}{210} \right)} \approx 146.05^\circ \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the law of cosines on the triangle u, v, u − v gives the same angle

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly computes the dot product and magnitudes, applies the cosine formula accurately, and states the final angle correctly.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-03 — The solution correctly computes the dot product and magnitudes, applies the cosine formula accurately, and states the final angle correctly.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-03
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-03 — The solution correctly computes the dot product and magnitudes, applies the cosine formula for the angle between vectors, and provides the correct final answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-03

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/dot_product_angle, checked 2026-10-03 with SymPy 1.14.0.