Cross product
Problem 9.102 · easy
Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{v} \) for \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle -2, 0, 1 \rangle,\ \mathbf{v} = \langle 0, -1, 0 \rangle \), and the area of the parallelogram they span.
- Expand the determinant with rows i j k, u, v.
- \[ \left[\begin{matrix}1\\0\\2\end{matrix}\right] \]The components.✓ Proved
- \[ \sqrt{5} \]Area = |u × v|.✓ Proved
Answer \( \mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v} = \langle 1, 0, 2 \rangle,\quad \text{area} = \sqrt{5} \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | Lagrange's identity √(|u|²|v|² − (u·v)²) gives the same area |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to explicitly state the cross product vector, which is required by the problem statement ('Find u x v'). It jumps directly to the magnitude calculation without showing the intermediate vector result.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution fails to explicitly state the cross product vector, which is required by the problem statement ('Find u x v'). It jumps directly to the magnitude calculation without showing the intermediate vector result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution fails to actually compute the cross product, providing no intermediate steps or result for \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{v}. Furthermore, the unchecked equations contain nonsensical data (identical matrices and repeated scalars) that do not correspond to the vectors given in the problem.gpt-oss:20b: inconclusive 2026-09-26 — reviewer returned a non-object
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/cross_product_area, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.