∫Calc Practice

Horizontal and vertical tangents of parametric curves

Problem 8.244 · medium

Find the points where \( \displaystyle x = t^{3} - 3 t,\ y = 3 t^{2} - 12 \) has a horizontal or a vertical tangent line.
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d t} \left(t^{3} - 3 t\right) = 3 t^{2} - 3 \]
    dx/dt.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \frac{d}{d t} \left(3 t^{2} - 12\right) = 6 t \]
    dy/dt.✓ Proved
  3. Horizontal tangent: dy/dt = 0 with dx/dt ≠ 0. Vertical: dx/dt = 0 with dy/dt ≠ 0.
  4. \[ \left. 6 t \right|_{\substack{ t=0 }} = 0 \]
    t = 0: horizontal, at (0, -12).✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. 3 t^{2} - 3 \right|_{\substack{ t=-1 }} = 0 \]
    t = -1: vertical, at (2, -9).✓ Proved
  6. \[ \left. 3 t^{2} - 3 \right|_{\substack{ t=1 }} = 0 \]
    t = 1: vertical, at (-2, -9).✓ Proved
Answer \( \text{horizontal at } (0, -12);\ \text{vertical at } (2, -9), (-2, -9) \)

Lines: 5 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0roots of dx/dt and dy/dt found by Newton's method from a dense grid

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution incorrectly identifies t = -1 and t = 1 as points with vertical tangents. At these values, dx/dt = 0 but dy/dt ≠ 0, which indeed indicat
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-17 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution incorrectly identifies t = -1 and t = 1 as points with vertical tangents. At these values, dx/dt = 0 but dy/dt ≠ 0, which indeed indicat
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution incorrectly identifies vertical tangents at t = ±1. At these points, dy/dt = ±6 ≠ 0, so the tangents are indeed vertical, but the coordi
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The solution incorrectly identifies the points for vertical tangents. It solves dx/dt = 0 to get t = ±1, but then incorrectly maps t = -1 to (2, -9) and t = 1 to (-2, -9). In reality, t = 1 gives (x,y) = (-2, -9) and t = -1 gives (x,y) = (2, -9). While the final set of points is correct, the intermediate mapping is swapped, which is a calculation error in the solution steps.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/parametric_tangent_hv, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.