Eliminating the parameter
Problem 8.234 · easy
Eliminate the parameter from \( \displaystyle x = - 2 t - 1,\ y = - t - 1 \), and say what kind of curve it is.
- t = (x − -1)/-2; substitute into y.
- \[ \left. \frac{\left(-1\right) x}{2} + y + 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=- 2 t - 1\\ y=- t - 1 }} = 0 \]The parametric point satisfies the equation for every t.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{1}{2}\ (\text{line}) \)
Lines: 1 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | points on the parametric curve at four values of t satisfy the equation |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to state the final Cartesian equation explicitly. While line 2 confirms the parametric point satisfies an implicit relation, it does not provide the explicit form y = x/2 - 1/2 requested by the problem statement.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-17 — The solution fails to state the final Cartesian equation explicitly. While line 2 confirms the parametric point satisfies an implicit relation, it does not provide the explicit form y = x/2 - 1/2 requested by the problem statement.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly eliminates the parameter and identifies the curve as a line. The algebraic steps are sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly eliminates the parameter and identifies the curve as a line. The algebraic steps are sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/parametric_eliminate, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.