Eliminating the parameter
Problem 8.221 · easy
Eliminate the parameter from \( \displaystyle x = t + 2,\ y = t^{2} - 2 \), and say what kind of curve it is.
- t = x − 2.Reviewed
- \[ \left. - x^{2} + 4 x + y - 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=t + 2\\ y=t^{2} - 2 }} = 0 \]The parametric point satisfies the equation for every t.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = x^{2} - 4 x + 2\ (\text{parabola}) \)
Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | points on the parametric curve at four values of t satisfy the equation |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly eliminates the parameter and identifies the curve. The equation in line 2 is algebraically equivalent to the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly eliminates the parameter and identifies the curve. The equation in line 2 is algebraically equivalent to the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly eliminates the parameter and identifies the curve as a parabola. The algebraic verification confirms the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-14 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The stated answer is incorrect. Substituting t = x - 2 into y = t^2 - 2 yields y = (x - 2)^2 - 2 = x^2 - 4x + 2. The provided solution line 2gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/parametric_eliminate, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.