Telescoping series
Problem 7.397 · easy
Find the sum of \( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{4}{n^{2} + 3 n + 2} \), or show that it diverges.
- \[ \frac{4}{n^{2} + 3 n + 2} = - \frac{4}{n + 2} + \frac{4}{n + 1} \]Partial fractions: the term is a difference.✓ Proved
- In the N-th partial sum every negative piece cancels a positive piece 1 term later; only the first positive and last negative pieces survive.Reviewed
- So S_N = 2 - 4/(N + 2).Reviewed
- \[ \lim_{k \to \infty}\left(2 - \frac{4}{k + 2}\right) = 2 \]Let N → ∞.✓ Proved
Answer \( 2 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 2 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | mpmath's nsum of the series (with convergence acceleration) |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the telescoping nature of the series, derives the correct partial sum formula, and computes the limit accurately.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly identifies the telescoping nature of the series, derives the correct partial sum formula, and computes the limit accurately.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly identifies the telescoping nature of the series and computes the limit of the partial sums accurately.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/telescoping_series, checked 2026-10-07 with SymPy 1.14.0.