Error bounds for series
Problem 7.387 · easy
Use the integral test bound \( \displaystyle R_N \le \int_N^\infty f(x)\,dx \) to find the smallest \( \displaystyle N \) for which the partial sum \( \displaystyle S_N \) of \( \displaystyle \sum 1/n^{2} \) is within \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{100} \) of the sum.
- \[ \int\limits_{101}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^{2}}\, dx = \frac{1}{101} \]With N = 101 the bound is 1/101 < 1/100.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{100}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^{2}}\, dx = \frac{1}{100} \]With N = 100 it is 1/100, not small enough.✓ Proved
Answer \( N = 101 \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the bound recomputed in floating point at N and N − 1 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the integral test bound R_N <= 1/N and identifies N=101 as the smallest integer satisfying the condition R_N < 1/100.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly applies the integral test bound R_N <= 1/N and identifies N=101 as the smallest integer satisfying the condition R_N < 1/100.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution fails to establish that N=100 is insufficient by checking the strict inequality required for the bound to be strictly less than 1/100,gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/series_error_bounds, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.