∫Calc Practice

The Lagrange error bound

Problem 7.343 · easy

What degree \( \displaystyle n \) of Maclaurin polynomial for \( \displaystyle \sin{\left(x \right)} \) guarantees, by the Lagrange error bound, an error less than \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{10000} \) at \( \displaystyle x = \frac{1}{5} \)?
  1. |Rₙ(x)| ≤ M|x|ⁿ⁺¹/(n + 1)!, where M bounds |f⁽ⁿ⁺¹⁾|; here M = 1 because |sin| and |cos| are at most 1.
  2. \[ 1 \cdot \frac{1}{15000} = \frac{1}{15000} \]
    n = 3: the bound is 1/15000 < 1/10000.✓ Proved
  3. \[ 1 \cdot \frac{1}{750} = \frac{1}{750} \]
    n = 2: the bound is 1/750, not below 1/10000.✓ Proved
Answer \( n = 3 \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the bound recomputed at n and n − 1

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to verify that n=2 does not satisfy the condition (1/750 > 1/10000), leaving open the possibility that a lower degree might work or that the logic is incomplete. More critically, it does not explicitly state that n=3 is the *smallest* integer satisfying the bound, which is required by the phrasing 'what degree... guarantees'. While n=3 is correct, the reasoning is incomplete and potentially misleading regarding the minimality requirement.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The solution fails to verify that n=2 does not satisfy the condition (1/750 > 1/10000), leaving open the possibility that a lower degree might work or that the logic is incomplete. More critically, it does not explicitly state that n=3 is the *smallest* integer satisfying the bound, which is required by the phrasing 'what degree... guarantees'. While n=3 is correct, the reasoning is incomplete and potentially misleading regarding the minimality requirement.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The solution incorrectly calculates the error bound for n=3 as 1/15000, whereas the correct Lagrange bound is |x|^4/4! = (1/5)^4/24 = 1/3000, which is not less than 1/10000. Consequently, the conclusion that n=3 is sufficient is false; n=5 is required.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/lagrange_error, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.