Maclaurin series by substitution
Problem 7.277 · medium
Use a known Maclaurin series to find the first four nonzero terms of the Maclaurin series of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \).
- Start from a known series (ln(1 + u), u = cx) and substitute or multiply term by term.Reviewed
- \[ \lim_{x \to 0^+}\left(\frac{\frac{x^{4}}{4} - \frac{x^{3}}{3} + \frac{x^{2}}{2} - x + \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)}}{x^{4}}\right) = 0 \]These terms match f through x^4.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{x^{4}}{4} + \frac{x^{3}}{3} - \frac{x^{2}}{2} + x + \cdots \)
Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | coefficients from derivatives at 0, and f − T is tiny at x = 0.01 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the standard Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) and the provided limit confirms the terms match up to the fourth degree. The stated answer lists the first four nonzero terms correctly.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly identifies the standard Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) and the provided limit confirms the terms match up to the fourth degree. The stated answer lists the first four nonzero terms correctly.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The stated answer lists terms in descending order of power, which is not the standard form for a Maclaurin series (ascending order). More critically, the solution provides no derivation or justification for the coefficients, merely asserting a limit check that confirms the terms match up to x^4 but does not explain how they were obtained from a 'known series' as requested.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/maclaurin_substitution, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.