∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 2›Geometric series›Problem 7.202

Geometric series

Problem 7.202 · easy Video

Does \( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} -2 \) converge? If so, find its sum.
  1. \[ -2 \]
    The first term, a.
  2. \[ 1 \]
    The common ratio, r.
  3. |r| = 1 ≥ 1, so the series diverges.
Answer \( \text{diverges} \)
Bars show the terms -2 for n = 1 to 24; dots show the running totals. The totals never settle: the series diverges.

Lines: 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line
2Not checked—both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the terms do not shrink (60th term checked)

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution incorrectly identifies the series as geometric with common ratio r=1. The series is a constant series (-2 + -2 + ...), which is not a geometric series with r=1 (which would be 1 + 1 + ...). The correct reason for divergence is that the terms do not approach zero (n-th term test).
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The solution incorrectly identifies the series as geometric with common ratio r=1. The series is a constant series (-2 + -2 + ...), which is not a geometric series with r=1 (which would be 1 + 1 + ...). The correct reason for divergence is that the terms do not approach zero (n-th term test).
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The solution incorrectly identifies the series as geometric with ratio r=1. The series is actually a constant series (sum of -2), which diverges by the Divergence Test because the terms do not approach 0. While the final conclusion is correct, the reasoning is fundamentally flawed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-09-29 — The solution incorrectly treats the series as a geometric series with ratio r=1. The test |r|≥1 applies only to geometric series, but the given series is not geometric; its terms are constant -2, so the partial sums tend to -∞ and the series diverges. The conclusion is correct, but the reasoning is misleading.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — The series is a constant term series, not a geometric series with ratio 1. Identifying the common ratio as 1 is incorrect; the terms do not form a geometric progression in the standard sense required for that test, and the divergence is due to the terms not approaching zero.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/geometric_series, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.