Initial-value problems needing partial fractions
Problem 6.767 · hard
Solve \( \displaystyle \left(t^{2} - 5 t + 4\right)\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 \) with \( \displaystyle x(5) = 0 \) (for \( \displaystyle t > 4 \)).
- Separate: dx = dt / (t**2 - 5*t + 4).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{1}{t^{2} - 5 t + 4} = - \frac{1}{3 t - 3} + \frac{1}{3 t - 12} \]Partial fractions.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 4}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} = \frac{1}{t^{2} - 5 t + 4} \]An antiderivative, checked by differentiating.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 4}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \right|_{\substack{ t=5 }} + 0 = \frac{2 \ln{\left(2 \right)}}{3} \]x(5) = 0 fixes the constant.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{4 \left(t - 4\right)}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \right|_{\substack{ t=5 }} = 0 \]The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( x(t) = \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{4 \left(t - 4\right)}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \)
Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | mpmath's ODE solver from t₀ to t₀ + 1 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the partial fraction decomposition and the resulting antiderivative. The constant of integration is correctly determined using the initial condition, and the final form matches the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-30 — The solution correctly identifies the partial fraction decomposition and the resulting antiderivative. The constant of integration is correctly determined using the initial condition, and the final form matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-30qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-29 — The solution correctly identifies the partial fraction decomposition and the resulting antiderivative. The constant of integration is determined correctly using the initial condition, and the final form matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-29qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-29 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The partial fraction decomposition in line 2 is incorrect; the correct decomposition is 1/(3(t-4)) - 1/(3(t-1)), which leads to ln((t-4)/(t-1))/3. Hogpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-29
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/ivp_partial_fractions, checked 2026-10-30 with SymPy 1.14.0.