First-order linear equations
Problem 6.75 · hard Video
Solve \( \displaystyle y' + 2y = 2 e^{- 2 x} \) with \( \displaystyle y(0) = 1 \).
- The equation is linear in standard form; the integrating factor is e^(∫2 dx) = e^(2x).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} Y{\left(x \right)} e^{2 x} = 2 Y{\left(x \right)} e^{2 x} + e^{2 x} \frac{d}{d x} Y{\left(x \right)} \]Multiplying by e^(ax) turns the left side into (e^(ax) y)'.✓ Proved
- \[ \int 2\, dx = 2 x \]Integrate the right side.✓ Proved
- Setting x = 0 and y = 1 fixes the constant of integration: C = 1.Reviewed
- \[ \left(4 x + 2\right) e^{- 2 x} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right) e^{- 2 x} = 2 e^{- 2 x} \]The solution satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
- \[ 1 \]And the initial condition.Reviewed
Answer \( y = \left(2 x + 1\right) e^{- 2 x} \)
Lines: 3 proved, 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 6 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | sympy.checkodesol substitutes the solution back; y(0) matches |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the integrating factor, performs the integration, applies the initial condition, and verifies the result. The steps are logically sound and mathematically correct.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28 — The solution correctly identifies the integrating factor, performs the integration, applies the initial condition, and verifies the result. The steps are logically sound and mathematically correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — The solution skips the crucial step of writing the general solution Y(x) = (2x + C)e^{-2x} before applying the initial condition. Without this intermediate step, the claim that 'Setting x = 0 and y = 1 fixes the constant... C = 1' is not logically derived from the previous lines, as the relationship between y, x, and C has not been established.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution skips the crucial step of writing the general solution Y(x) = (2x + C)e^{-2x} before applying the initial condition. While the final answer is correct, the logical jump from the integrated form to the specific constant without stating the general solution is a significant pedagogical error and makes the derivation incomplete.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/linear_first_order, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.