Differential equations by direct integration
Problem 6.742 · easy
Solve \( \displaystyle y' = 2 x e^{x^{2}} \) with \( \displaystyle y(1) = 7 \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} e^{x^{2}} = 2 x e^{x^{2}} \]Integrate: y = this + C.✓ Proved
- \[ 7 - \left. e^{x^{2}} \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 7 - e \]y(1) = 7 fixes C.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. e^{x^{2}} - e + 7 \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 7 \]The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = e^{x^{2}} - e + 7 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | finite differences of the answer match f, and the initial value holds |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative, solves for the constant of integration using the initial condition, and verifies the result.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-26 — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative, solves for the constant of integration using the initial condition, and verifies the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-26qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-25 — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative, applies the initial condition to find the constant, and verifies the result. The logic is sound and complete.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-25qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-25 — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative, applies the initial condition to find the constant, and verifies the result. The logic is sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-25
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/de_direct_integration, checked 2026-10-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.