∫Calc Practice

Second-order initial and boundary value problems

Problem 6.710 · medium

Solve \( \displaystyle 3 y + 4 y' + y'' = 0 \) with \( \displaystyle y(0) = -2,\ y'(0) = -2 \).
  1. \[ m^{2} + 4 m + 3 = \left(m + 1\right) \left(m + 3\right) \]
    The characteristic equation has distinct real roots -3 and -1.✓ Proved
  2. So y = C₁exp(-3*x) + C₂exp(-x); the two conditions fix C₁ and C₂.
  3. \[ 4 \frac{d}{d x} \left(- 4 e^{- x} + 2 e^{- 3 x}\right) + \frac{d^{2}}{d x^{2}} \left(- 4 e^{- x} + 2 e^{- 3 x}\right) - 12 e^{- x} + 6 e^{- 3 x} = 0 \]
    It satisfies the equation ...✓ Proved
  4. \[ \left. - 4 e^{- x} + 2 e^{- 3 x} \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = -2 \]
    ... y(0) = -2 ...✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. \frac{d}{d x} \left(- 4 e^{- x} + 2 e^{- 3 x}\right) \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = -2 \]
    y′(0) = -2.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = - 4 e^{- x} + 2 e^{- 3 x} \)

Lines: 4 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0finite differences of the answer satisfy the equation, and the conditions hold in floating point

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to derive the constants C1 and C2 from the initial conditions. It jumps from the general form to the specific answer and then verifies it, rather than showing the necessary calculation steps.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-20 — The solution fails to derive the constants C1 and C2 from the initial conditions. It jumps from the general form to the specific answer and then verifies it, rather than showing the necessary calculation steps.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly derives the general solution from the characteristic equation and verifies that the specific constants satisfy both the differential equation and the initial conditions.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-19 — The solution skips the step of solving for the constants C1 and C2 using the initial conditions. It jumps from the general solution to the specific answer without showing the system of equations that determines the coefficients, making the derivation incomplete and logically disconnected.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/second_order_ivp_bvp, checked 2026-10-20 with SymPy 1.14.0.