Initial-value problems needing partial fractions
Problem 6.691 · hard
Solve \( \displaystyle \left(t^{2} - 2 t - 15\right)\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 \) with \( \displaystyle x(7) = 0 \) (for \( \displaystyle t > 5 \)).
- Separate: dx = dt / (t**2 - 2*t - 15).
- \[ \frac{1}{t^{2} - 2 t - 15} = - \frac{1}{8 t + 24} + \frac{1}{8 t - 40} \]Partial fractions.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 5}{t + 3} \right)}}{8} = \frac{1}{t^{2} - 2 t - 15} \]An antiderivative, checked by differentiating.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 5}{t + 3} \right)}}{8} \right|_{\substack{ t=7 }} + 0 = \frac{\ln{\left(5 \right)}}{8} \]x(7) = 0 fixes the constant.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{5 \left(t - 5\right)}{t + 3} \right)}}{8} \right|_{\substack{ t=7 }} = 0 \]The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( x(t) = \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{5 \left(t - 5\right)}{t + 3} \right)}}{8} \)
Lines: 4 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | mpmath's ODE solver from t₀ to t₀ + 1 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution ignores the domain constraint t > 5, which requires the argument of the logarithm to be positive. It should use ln((t-5)/(t+3)) or ln((5
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-19 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution ignores the domain constraint t > 5, which requires the argument of the logarithm to be positive. It should use ln((t-5)/(t+3)) or ln((5gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-17 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The solution ignores the domain constraint t > 5, which implies t - 5 > 0. Consequently, it fails to use absolute values in the logarithm (ln|t-5|), leading to an incorrect constant of integration. The correct solution should be x(t) = (1/8)ln((t-5)/(t+3)), whereas the provided answer includes an extraneous factor of 5 inside the logarithm.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly separates variables, applies partial fraction decomposition, and determines the constant of integration to satisfy the initial condition. The final expression matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/ivp_partial_fractions, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.