∫Calc Practice

Second-order initial and boundary value problems

Problem 6.620 · medium

Solve \( \displaystyle 5 y - 2 y' + y'' = 0 \) with \( \displaystyle y(0) = 4,\ y'(0) = 0 \).
  1. \[ m^{2} - 2 m + 5 = \left(m - 1 - 2 i\right) \left(m - 1 + 2 i\right) \]
    The characteristic equation has complex roots 1 ± 2i.✓ Proved
  2. So y = C₁exp(x)*cos(2*x) + C₂exp(x)*sin(2*x); the two conditions fix C₁ and C₂.
    Reviewed
  3. \[ 5 \left(- 2 \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 4 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} - 2 \frac{d}{d x} \left(- 2 \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 4 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} + \frac{d^{2}}{d x^{2}} \left(- 2 \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 4 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} = 0 \]
    It satisfies the equation ...✓ Proved
  4. \[ \left. 2 \left(- \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 2 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = 4 \]
    ... y(0) = 4 ...✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. \frac{d}{d x} 2 \left(- \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 2 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = 0 \]
    y′(0) = 0.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = 2 \left(- \sin{\left(2 x \right)} + 2 \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) e^{x} \)

Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0finite differences of the answer satisfy the equation, and the conditions hold in floating point

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-16 — The solution skips the derivation of the constants C1 and C2, jumping directly to the final answer. It then verifies the answer rather than solving for the constants, which fails to demonstrate the required method for finding the specific solution from initial conditions.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly identifies the general form of the solution for complex roots and verifies that the specific answer satisfies the differential equation and initial conditions.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/second_order_ivp_bvp, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.