Initial-value problems needing partial fractions
Problem 6.615 · hard
Solve \( \displaystyle \left(t^{2} - 5 t + 4\right)\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 \) with \( \displaystyle x(7) = 0 \) (for \( \displaystyle t > 4 \)).
- Separate: dx = dt / (t**2 - 5*t + 4).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{1}{t^{2} - 5 t + 4} = - \frac{1}{3 t - 3} + \frac{1}{3 t - 12} \]Partial fractions.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 4}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} = \frac{1}{t^{2} - 5 t + 4} \]An antiderivative, checked by differentiating.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 4}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \right|_{\substack{ t=7 }} + 0 = \frac{\ln{\left(2 \right)}}{3} \]x(7) = 0 fixes the constant.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{2 \left(t - 4\right)}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \right|_{\substack{ t=7 }} = 0 \]The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( x(t) = \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{2 \left(t - 4\right)}{t - 1} \right)}}{3} \)
Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | mpmath's ODE solver from t₀ to t₀ + 1 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly separates variables, applies partial fraction decomposition, integrates, and determines the constant of integration to satisfy the initial condition. The final expression matches the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly separates variables, applies partial fraction decomposition, integrates, and determines the constant of integration to satisfy the initial condition. The final expression matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the antiderivative and applies the initial condition to determine the constant of integration. The final expression satisfies both the differential equation and the initial condition.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-15 — The solution fails to include the constant of integration when integrating the separated equation. It incorrectly assumes the antiderivative itself satisfies the initial condition or conflates the indefinite integral with the definite integral setup, leading to a logically invalid derivation of the constant.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/ivp_partial_fractions, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.