∫Calc Practice

Initial-value problems needing partial fractions

Problem 6.612 · hard

Solve \( \displaystyle \left(t^{2} - 2 t\right)\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 \) with \( \displaystyle x(5) = 0 \) (for \( \displaystyle t > 2 \)).
  1. Separate: dx = dt / (t**2 - 2*t).
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \frac{1}{t^{2} - 2 t} = \frac{1}{2 t - 4} - \frac{1}{2 t} \]
    Partial fractions.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 2}{t} \right)}}{2} = \frac{1}{t^{2} - 2 t} \]
    An antiderivative, checked by differentiating.✓ Proved
  4. \[ - \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{t - 2}{t} \right)}}{2} \right|_{\substack{ t=5 }} + 0 = - \frac{\ln{\left(3 \right)}}{2} + \frac{\ln{\left(5 \right)}}{2} \]
    x(5) = 0 fixes the constant.✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{5 \left(t - 2\right)}{3 t} \right)}}{2} \right|_{\substack{ t=5 }} = 0 \]
    The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( x(t) = \frac{\ln{\left(\frac{5 \left(t - 2\right)}{3 t} \right)}}{2} \)

Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0mpmath's ODE solver from t₀ to t₀ + 1

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies separation of variables and partial fraction decomposition. The handling of the initial condition and the resulting constant is algebraically sound and consistent with the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly applies separation of variables and partial fraction decomposition. The handling of the initial condition and the resulting constant is algebraically sound and consistent with the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-16 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution fails to account for the absolute value in the logarithm arising from the integration of 1/t terms. Since the domain is t > 2, t is pos
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly separates variables, applies partial fraction decomposition, integrates, and determines the constant of integration using the initial condition. The final expression matches the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/ivp_partial_fractions, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.