Initial-value problems needing partial fractions
Problem 6.608 · hard
Solve \( \displaystyle \left(t^{2} + t\right)\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1 \) with \( \displaystyle x(1) = 0 \) (for \( \displaystyle t > 0 \)).
- Separate: dx = dt / (t**2 + t).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{1}{t^{2} + t} = - \frac{1}{t + 1} + \frac{1}{t} \]Partial fractions.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{d}{d t} \ln{\left(\frac{t}{t + 1} \right)} = \frac{1}{t^{2} + t} \]An antiderivative, checked by differentiating.✓ Proved
- \[ - \left. \ln{\left(\frac{t}{t + 1} \right)} \right|_{\substack{ t=1 }} + 0 = \ln{\left(2 \right)} \]x(1) = 0 fixes the constant.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \ln{\left(\frac{2 t}{t + 1} \right)} \right|_{\substack{ t=1 }} = 0 \]The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( x(t) = \ln{\left(\frac{2 t}{t + 1} \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | mpmath's ODE solver from t₀ to t₀ + 1 |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly separates variables, identifies the antiderivative, and determines the constant of integration to satisfy the initial condition. The final expression matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly separates variables, applies partial fraction decomposition, and determines the constant of integration to satisfy the initial condition. The final result matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/ivp_partial_fractions, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.